W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2008

Re: <UL> cited as <OL> (was : [css3-webfonts] Downloaded fonts should not...)

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:52:26 -0700
Message-ID: <47FE53DA.5070204@inkedblade.net>
To: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
CC: Ambrose Li <ambrose.li@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org

Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> 
> Apropos of an earlier discussion, here is an
> interesting (and perhaps classic) example of
> an unordered list (as perceived by its author)
> being cited as an ordered list by a commentator :

Philip, this is off-topic. (And besides, restyling <ul>
with numbers is perfectly reasonable: in that case
they function as labels rather than to emphasize the
inherent order.)

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 17:53:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:05 GMT