- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:14:38 +0100
- To: Ambrose Li <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
Apropos of an earlier discussion, here is an interesting (and perhaps classic) example of an unordered list (as perceived by its author) being cited as an ordered list by a commentator : Ambrose Li wrote: > On 10/04/2008, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> L. David Baron wrote: >>> I'm not quite sure what you mean by "in a technical way". But I can >>> . . . >>> * the font might be in a highly unusual style that you wouldn't >>> . . . >>> * the font might use an encoding hack where it encodes glyphs that >>> . . . >>> * the font might be a malicious font designed to make the text in >>> . . . >> Add to that >> >> * the font might be subsetted for that particular page/website, leaving >> . . . > I think points 1 and 4 are valid uses. > > But I think points 2 and 3 are abuses . . .
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 13:18:04 UTC