- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:50:56 +0200
- To: www-style CSS <www-style@w3.org>
fantasai: > RATIONALE: Since a number followed by alphabetic is parsed as a > length, > we can't allow '90deg' but not '90.0deg'. If we allow > radians, > then what matches? '3.14rad' and '3.14159rad' are both > approximations of 180deg, but they are neither equal > to 180deg > nor equal to each other. I've argued before that 'rad' is a useless unit in CSS practice, 'pirad' or simply 'pi' might have been a better choice.
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:51:17 UTC