David Baron wrote: > min-height is never greater than the used height. It's either less > than or equal. (If it were greater, than we'd be violating the rule > that the used height is at least as large as the min-height.) Yes, my formulation was wrong. Still, an element may have 'used height' equal to 'min-height' not because min-height is in effect, but because this is the height of its content (a sort of borderline case, but well possible.) I would like to see this case listed among the ones with collapsing allowed (Firefox behaves in this way.) Ideally one should say "used height before min-height is applied" and include the equality case. Bruno -- Bruno Fassino http://www.brunildo.org/testReceived on Monday, 15 October 2007 07:26:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 15 October 2007 07:26:41 GMT