- From: Grant, Melinda <melinda.grant@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:12:50 -0000
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Ludger Bünger <ludger.buenger@realobjects.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Hi Boris, Boris said: > Ludger Bunger said: > > Actually, the cascading rules are pretty intelligent. > > Frankly, no. They're pretty simplistic, for this purpose. (...the context being paged media headers and footers...) This concern was explicitly considered during the Mt. View f2f earlier this year as a Last Call issue for css3-page. The Working Group's conclusion was that the cascade provides sufficient control for page headers/footers. Members can see http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css3-src/css3-page/issues.htm#issue9. > > I think, this is pretty well what the paged module working group is > > working on... > > Yes, all I'm saying is that from what I can tell they're > failing at it. That's why I got involved in this thread, frankly. Well, we certainly look forward to your detailed proposal. ;-) But as this has been through last call and there are implementations, it will be important to consider backward-compatibility. Best wishes, Melinda
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2007 01:14:35 UTC