- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:47:28 -0500
- To: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Mikko Rantalainen wrote: > Grant, Melinda wrote: >> fantasai said: >>> Just finished drafting the new text-decoration >>> (underline/overline/strike-through) section: >>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#line-decoration >>> >>> Comments welcome. >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#line-decoration says that the UA >> "must use the same baseline and thickness on each line." >> >> I would think the thickness could vary within one line (as the example >> below illustrates.) Maybe you want "text fragment" or some such...? > > Perhaps the text is trying to say that in case the parent specifies a > line (e.g. underlining) and child has different font size and its own > declaration for the line (underlining), then there should not be two > different underlinings (one for the parent and one for the child) but > instead UA should decide between the two. I'm not sure which one should > be used. > > I agree that the wording should be changed to be more exact. No, what it's trying to say is that for a *given element*'s text decoration, the line should be of a constant position and thickness throughout the line. If a child element or a sibling element has *its own* underline, then that can be drawn at a different thickness and position. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2007 23:47:47 UTC