W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2007

RE: CSS2, 3.2 Conformance, point 4...

From: Fennell, Philip <philip.fennell@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:48:30 +0100
Message-ID: <C4B3FB61F7970A4391A5C10BAA1C3F0D811DA1@sdcexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: <www-style@w3.org>

David,

> Only conceptually.  It has to behave in terms of what gets rendered,
as though that were the case.

Are you implying that it is possible to leave some stuff out?

If so, could you expand a little bit on that statement.


Regards

Philip Fennell



-----Original Message-----
From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of David Woolley
Sent: 23 March 2007 23:14
To: www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: CSS2, 3.2 Conformance, point 4...


> That every descendant of the 'feed' element will need to carry the

Just to avoid confusion, this would apply even if feed were not
referenced in an explicit style sheet.

> inheritable css:color attribute in order for my implementation to 
> claim conformance to CSS 2?

Only conceptually.  It has to behave in terms of what gets rendered, as
though that were the case.
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 13:48:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:50 GMT