David Woolley wrote: >> It needs some more love from CSS experts and browser developers, but it is >> quite comprehensive and ASFAIK neutral. > > I suspect neither of these groups would be good choices of people to > edit the article as it is too easy for them to include "original research". > They would have to be meticulous about providing published sources for > everything. You mean like links to implementation reports based on the CSS test suites? ;) That's what should really happen, imo. -BorisReceived on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 22:09:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:49 GMT