W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Capability

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:09:28 +0100
To: "Christopher Tom" <cctom@hawaii.rr.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tlvs521d64w2qv@id-c0020>


On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:57:10 +0100, Christopher Tom <cctom@hawaii.rr.com>  
wrote:
> In my view, a specification does not need to provide extra capability to  
> be considered a better choice.

Well, when there are implementations it's a little different.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 10:09:42 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: fantasai: "Re: [CSS3 Text] Tibetan justification"
Previous message: Christopher Tom: "Capability"
In reply to: Christopher Tom: "Capability"
Next in thread: Christopher Tom: "Re: Capability"
Reply: Christopher Tom: "Re: Capability"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:22:34 GMT