- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:20:21 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
Boris,
I haven't (yet) completed an authoritative analysis of current UA
behaviour in this respect.
however using a user style sheet:
:link, :visited { text-decoration: underline ! important }
this worked well with many html pages, however with svg it appears it
may not for Opera, Amaya and Camino
I wasn't able to enable ie5.2 to accept a user style sheet.
I often get things wrong, but if right, it does seem as this is a
fairly basic failure to implement a standard.
Please bear in mind this is merely one example......
regards
Jonathan Chetwynd
On 9 Feb 2007, at 09:04, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
> it seems clear to me at least from your responses that specificity
> is a clear example where the w3c process has not considered users
> needs.
I'm not quite sure what in my response gave you that idea.
I can see where you might have gotten that idea from David's
response, but I think his statement was incorrect.
If you look at the history of the specificity section, user needs
were definitely considered -- this is why user stylesheet !important
rules override all author rules. Didn't use to be that way in the
early drafts. ;)
> from an initial consideration of accessibility, the user being non-
> technical needs a simple style sheet that works out of the box
> across the web, if it is to be of any use at all.
A simple stylesheet that does what?
-Boris
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 14:20:36 UTC