W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2007

Re: [CSS21] [css3-speech] More specific about alternatives to 'cue' sounds

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:00:17 -0500
Message-ID: <476ABBC1.2050106@inkedblade.net>
To: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
CC: www-style@w3.org

Al Gilman wrote:
> 
> 
> Currently, the CSS2.1 Last Call draft's Appendix A, states:
> 
> This is insufficient from the point of view of those who benefit
> from aural styling; this definition should contain even more
> robust verbiage than is contained in Section 19 of CSS2:
> ...
> The Protocols & Formats working group proposes that the extant text in
> the CSS2.1 Candidate Recommendation draft be amended as follows:

Al, CSS2.1 is currently a Candidate Recommendation, not a Last Call
Working Draft; furthermore Appendix A is only informative. Your
proposed text doesn't seem to say anything different from what is
there, it only adds more examples. I can suggest that the CSS3 Speech
editor consider adding some more example text to the CSS3 Speech
draft
   http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-speech/
but I'm not convinced that we need to make this change for CSS2.1.

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2007 19:00:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:57 GMT