W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2007

RE: [CSSWG] Resolutions 2007-08-28

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:01:48 +0100
To: "'fantasai'" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007901c7ea3c$c29f36e0$6701a8c0@rishida>

Elika,

These are very useful emails. It shows how the group is making progress. I
suggest that you add the text to the CSS blog, too, since you'll probably
reach a wider audience that way.

RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-style-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of fantasai
> Sent: 28 August 2007 22:51
> To: www-style@w3.org
> Subject: [CSSWG] Resolutions 2007-08-28
> 
> 
> RESOLVED:
> 
>    CSS Validator should use no special profile by default: 
> the default should be
>      to include all features defined in a CR level draft.
> 
>    Media Queries shall
>      - add 'aspect-ratio' in addition to 
> 'device-aspect-ratio', both with the
>        same #/# syntax.
>      - add 'landscape' and 'portrait' as stand-alone keywords
>      - mark both 'aspect-ratio' and 'device-aspect-ratio' as 
> at-risk for removal
>        during the CR period
> 
>    To handle non-square pixels in Media Queries, the 
> following proposal was accepted:
>      http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Aug/0097.html
> 
>    Media Queries shall not include any normative requirements 
> on re-evaluating
>      media queries in responses to changes in the 
> environment, but shall include
>      a note explaining that a UA is expected to re-evaluate 
> and re-layout the page
>      in response to viewport resizing.
> 
> Other notes:
>    Discussed publishing new Grid Layout proposal.
>    Discussed splitting GCMP into more coherent modules. Håkon 
> doesn't expects
>      many features there to move to other drafts or be 
> dropped, but thinks there
>      will still be some print-centric features that stay.
>    Discussed CSS Validator features, HTML upload capability 
> was suggested.
>    Discussed topics for upcoming F2F (2 weeks from now). (Let 
> me know if there
>      are any outstanding issues you feel we should add.)
> 
> ~fantasai
> 
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2007 12:59:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:52 GMT