W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2007

[Bug 360746] The right panel has disappeared at andrewdupont.net (fwd)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:19:12 +0000 (UTC)
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0704160917550.17772@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>


Could you address the comments below in the CSSOM spec? Currently the spec 
is extremely vague about what happens when you mutate the attributes on an 
element that imports a style sheet.

Also, the spec uses the term "alternate style sheet"; it should probably 
be "alternative style sheet".

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Subject: [Bug 360746] The right panel has disappeared at andrewdupont.net
From: bugzilla-daemon@mozilla.org
To: ian@hixie.ch
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:03:05 -0700

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at

--- Comment #5 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>  2007-04-16 02:03:03 PDT ---
I'm not sure that covers what I'm asking.

What I'm asking are two questions:

1)  Should a change of "rel" from "alternate stylesheet" to "stylesheet" have
any effect?  If so, what?

2)  If an alternate (so disabled) sheet gets enabled via the DOM api and then
the <link> is changed such that a new sheet load has to start (change of href,
possibly change of rel, possibly change of title, etc), should the new sheet
that loads have the same state as the old sheet, or should it be different

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 09:19:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:28 UTC