- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:48:03 +1200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>, www-style@w3.org
Chris Lilley wrote: > On Thursday, September 7, 2006, 7:45:40 PM, François wrote: > > FY> BTW the terminology is *not* used as in [XML-NAMES11] (but should be, > FY> IMHO). For example, first sentence of Section 3: "The @namespace > FY> at-rule declares a namespace prefix and associates it with a given > FY> namespace (a string)." A namespace is not a string; it is identified by > FY> a string, which [XML-NAMES11] calls the namespace name. > > So "The @namespace at-rule declares a namespace prefix and associates it > with a given namespace name (a string)." would respond to your comment. > > FY> There's another > FY> case not far below: "it is the expanded name (the tuple of local name > FY> and namespace) that is significant." [XML-NAMES11] says: "[Definition: > FY> An expanded name is a pair consisting of a namespace name and a local > FY> name. ]" > > So "it is the expanded name (the tuple of local name and namespace name) > that is significant." > > Did you spot any other instances of incorrect use of terminology besides > these two? If so, could you list them? Thank you, Chris, I've corrected those two. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 16 September 2006 08:06:45 UTC