Werner Donné wrote: > The "URI" in the original grammar is merely the following > lexical token: "url("{w}{string}{w}")". It says nothing > about the validity of the URI itself. It is, IMHO, a matter of deep regret that "URI" is not defined as "url"{w}"("{w}{string}{w}")" As it stands, it panders to the needs of those who habitually place white space between the parentheses and the string, whilst totally alienating those who habitually place white space before the open parenthesis. Is there any possibility that both groups could be treated equally in some not- too-distant re-write of the specification ? Philip TaylorReceived on Monday, 11 September 2006 15:46:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:22:32 GMT