W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2006

Re: Downloadable fonts and image replacement

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 11:08:04 +0200
Message-ID: <445872F4.5030602@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
David Woolley schreef:
>> can=92t render, actually, it seems only logical, and it is what most UAs=20
>> do today. So I don=92t think there is a problem.
> Most browsers are IE.  IE doesn't!

We’re talking about new features, whose implementation is going to be 
years in the future. Plenty of time for IE, when they’re going to 
implement this, to fix their fallback behaviour at the same time.

I don’t see why a current (fixable) bug in one browser should put limits 
on future behaviour... The other implementations clearly show that this 
can be implemented interoperably, and as far as the specification is 
concerned this should be enough, for now.

So as I said, I don’t think there is a problem.


Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!!
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.

Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2006 09:08:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:24 UTC