W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2006

Re: [css21] definition of intrinsic

From: Spartanicus <spartanicus.3@ntlworld.ie>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:59:30 +0000
Message-ID: <n2m-g.g798229bnp73v760qb5po18e04e6b1iqp4@news.spartanicus.utvinternet.ie>
To: www-style@w3.org

"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> wrote:

>>> I believe the definition given in
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#intrinsic is incorrect as it
>>> states that CSS 2.1 assumes that all replaced elements have intrinsic
>>> dimensions, while CSS 2.1 doesn't make such an assumption at all.
>>
>> It does right there, imo no other reference or explanation is required
>> since it is a normative statement.
>
>I'm not sure what you mean. Note that section 10.3.2[1], 10.6.2 and  
>related sections clearly state how to come to a 'width' and 'height' for a  
>replaced element when no intrinsic dimensions are available...

Right you are, I need to clear 2.0 out of my memory.

-- 
Spartanicus

(email whitelist in use, non list-server mail will not be seen)
Received on Friday, 24 March 2006 17:04:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:44 GMT