W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2006

Re: [css21] definition of intrinsic

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:04:54 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s6xdmgrn64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:52:15 +0100, Spartanicus  
<spartanicus.3@ntlworld.ie> wrote:
>> I believe the definition given in
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#intrinsic is incorrect as it
>> states that CSS 2.1 assumes that all replaced elements have intrinsic
>> dimensions, while CSS 2.1 doesn't make such an assumption at all.
>
> It does right there, imo no other reference or explanation is required
> since it is a normative statement.

I'm not sure what you mean. Note that section 10.3.2[1], 10.6.2 and  
related sections clearly state how to come to a 'width' and 'height' for a  
replaced element when no intrinsic dimensions are available...


[1]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/visudet.html#inline-replaced-width>
[2]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/visudet.html#inline-replaced-height>


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 24 March 2006 16:05:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:44 GMT