Re: [BULK] - Re: [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation" (PR#7759)

Chris Sullins wrote:
> In my opinion, "style" makes perfect sense.
I'm not sure I agree. I do not speak English natively, so I may be wrong 
about this. I see "style" simply as colors and fonts etc. - what about 
animations? I'd much prefer "presentation", which in my mind covers more 
ground.

  <xml:presentation type="text/css">
    <![CDATA[
      body { background-color: #ABC; }
    ]]>
  </xml:presentation>

  <xml:presentation type="...">
    ... random animation language ...
  </xml:presentation>


This is of course not necessary for XML technologies such as SMIL, 
simply because they can be directly embedded into the document using 
namespaces, but I can imagine that somewhere down the road there'll be a 
need for a different approach to animations.


Cheers,
Daniel Schierbeck