W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2006

Re: [BULK] - Re: [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation" (PR#7759)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:57:51 +0100
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s5bhypvz64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:56:59 +0100, Paul Mitchell  
<paul@paul-mitchell.me.uk> wrote:
> If I could be certain that Anne and Kelly were talking about the same
> thing, I would have counted their votes already, but I'm not.

I wasn't talking about the same thing. I noted that there are quite a few  
<style> elements out there and that it would be good if they used the same  
definition for processing their contents once the element is parsed. (How  
it is parsed depends on whether the document is HTML or XML.) A generic  
inline style mechanisms would some day be available once  
<?xml-stylesheet?> is updated I assume. The element it points to could use  
hte same definition as <style> does...

Dunno for generic inline script. <?xml-script?> or so...


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 10:05:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:43 GMT