W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2006

Re: [BULK] - Re: [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation" (PR#7759)

From: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:55:24 -0500
Message-ID: <43FA64FC.4040407@gmail.com>
To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
CC: www-style@w3.org

Hash: SHA1

If there is a consideration for a behavioral tag in XML, I believe it
should be called behavior, not script.  As mentioned, who says that
behavior has to be specified using scripting?

And yes, I meant in some separate namespace, be it xml:style or
css:style or something that can be recognized as saying "this is
presentation, not part of the semantic XML".

David Woolley wrote:
|> Some things are universal, and deserve a special place in the world.
|> Style and script are universal to browsers, so I just accept that HTML
| I might be wrong, but I am pretty sure that <script> originated from
| JavaScript and not from HTML, or at least not from the HTML
| process.

- --
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox!
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox!

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 00:55:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:23 UTC