David Dorward schreef: >> or specify content types. >> > > So it would be standard for all XML documents, but not XML documents > of type application/movie-script+xml? This strikes me as, at best, a > confusing way to go about things. > Surely Paul meant for such a <script> and <style> element to be in their own namespace, e.g. <xml:script> or <css:style> or whatever…? They’re in a different namespace, and in a different namespace the meaning can be different. Whether in natural language a single word can have multiple meanings seems quite irrelevant to me (in other natural languages its name means nothing at all, that doesn’t seem to be a problem either), as long as it’s not *entirely* unintuitive. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 17:37:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:43 GMT