- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:24:14 +0000
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:10:49PM +0000, Paul Mitchell wrote: > Good examples, although the fashion and movie industries might not > appreciate being seen as reasons for the web to avoid agreement on > important matters This could be interpreted as an accusation that I don't want to find a solution to the problem and am actively looking for ways to avoid finding one. I'm not, I just don't think that this is a good solution. > , and could be persuaded to use other terms, It might be a bit late for that if such formats are already in use. > or specify content types. So it would be standard for all XML documents, but not XML documents of type application/movie-script+xml? This strikes me as, at best, a confusing way to go about things. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 17:24:18 UTC