On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:10:49PM +0000, Paul Mitchell wrote: > Good examples, although the fashion and movie industries might not > appreciate being seen as reasons for the web to avoid agreement on > important matters This could be interpreted as an accusation that I don't want to find a solution to the problem and am actively looking for ways to avoid finding one. I'm not, I just don't think that this is a good solution. > , and could be persuaded to use other terms, It might be a bit late for that if such formats are already in use. > or specify content types. So it would be standard for all XML documents, but not XML documents of type application/movie-script+xml? This strikes me as, at best, a confusing way to go about things. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.ukReceived on Monday, 20 February 2006 17:24:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:43 GMT