W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2006

Re: Question about linking CSS to XML vocabularies

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:59:33 +0000
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20061230115933.GJ21344@us-lot.org>

On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 12:56:09PM +0100, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> There is a difference only because we are, nowadays, unable to
> declaratively express the semantics attached to an element or an
> attribute and link it to the document instance. Solve that issue
> and you can get rid of my "visually" above.

What's the point of having arbitrary XML with a separate language for
describing its semantics?

You end up with the old <tag semantics="foo"><tag semantics="bar"
/></tag> instead of <foo><bar /></foo> situation.

"foo", "bar", etc still have to be defined somewhere.

-- 
David Dorward                                      http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Saturday, 30 December 2006 11:59:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:48 GMT