On 17 Aug 2006, at 17:00, Jan Brasna wrote: > What comes to my mind is licensing. I haven't found anything about > this in the specs - does that mean that the font file has to have > some kind of a free licensing scheme to be effectively put online > for usage like this? It's perhaps the same as any other licensing issue of the web, such as licenses to reproduce images on a website. In practice, I'm not sure I see it as a CSS spec issue to fix that problem. That said, it was discussed at length a few months ago. As I see it, there are many potential routes for font foundries to control the redistribution of their fonts: Centralising the location and only allowing downloads when the referrer header is on an approved list of licensed sites? DRM? Trust and honesty? I think so long as the CSS implementation doesn't do anything to impede such hypothetical authentication/control mechanisms that commercial foundries could implement at any point, it doesn't need to do anything more. BenReceived on Thursday, 17 August 2006 21:22:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT