W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2005

Re: Printing a Book with CSS

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:52:23 +0100
Message-ID: <438DE6D7.9030209@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: www-style@w3.org

Håkon Wium Lie schreef:
> This is experimental stuff which could be changed on short notice so
> it makes sens to not document it now.
>   

If you don’t mind me saying, I don’t agree with that :). If you 
advertise the functionality (it’s there for quite a while already, 
right?), if it’s part of your product, even though it may change in a 
next version, for the user it’s better if it is documented… That’s 
easier than having to look in example files how it’s done.

So it may be in the manufacturer’s interest to not document experimental 
features to save manpower, which conflicts with the user’s interest that 
there is never enough documentation. But to say that ‘it makes sense’, 
nah :).

Also, if you want it to be a basis for additions to the standard, 
wouldn’t it be better to at least have documented how you have 
implemented, so that discussions can take place on something more 
concrete? (but of course you did that in this message ^_^).


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2005 17:52:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:41 GMT