W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2005

Re: ::can-have-focus pseudo-class?

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:20:00 +0100
Message-Id: <C294AC6E-A3CC-477F-BA4B-21847D09290A@empyree.org>
To: www-style@w3.org



Le 1 nov. 05 à 16:09, Orion Adrian a écrit :

> Wouldn't it be more in style to have ::can-have(:focus)

err... right

-- 
</david_latapie>
blog.empyree.org

Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2005 15:20:04 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anne van Kesteren: "Line Breaking Properties and the inline box model"
Previous message: Orion Adrian: "Re: ::can-have-focus pseudo-class?"
In reply to: Orion Adrian: "Re: ::can-have-focus pseudo-class?"
Next in thread: Martijn: "Re: ::can-have-focus pseudo-class?"
Reply: Martijn: "Re: ::can-have-focus pseudo-class?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:41 GMT