W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2005

Re: ::can-have-focus pseudo-class?

From: Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:09:02 +0100
Message-ID: <6c97b8b10511010809y29771144rc3cdce5277e704e4@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style@w3.org

Sounds like a good idea.
But I believe it should then be :can-have(:focus) with one colon,
since it is a pseudo-class
Maybe a better name would be :can-have-state(:focus) or something.

Regards,
Martijn


On 11/1/05, David Latapie <david@empyree.org> wrote:
>
>
> Le 1 nov. 05 à 16:09, Orion Adrian a écrit :
>
> > Wouldn't it be more in style to have ::can-have(:focus)
>
> err... right
>
> --
> </david_latapie>
> blog.empyree.org
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2005 16:09:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:41 GMT