W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2005

Re: conflicts in CSS Print Profile?

From: Junzo IKUTA <ikuta.junzo@jp.panasonic.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:21:46 +0900
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <20050520091250.3086.IKUTA.JUNZO@jp.panasonic.com>

Sorry, probably I've  mis-read the spec for this point.
(I think I've read "Introduction to CSS3", http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-roadmap-20010523/
 and in 3.6 Box model, I've followed "11. Visual effects", http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visufx.html
 and thus gone to CSS2.0... )

Junzo IKUTA <ikuta.junzo@jp.panasonic.com>

On Thu, 19 May 2005 12:09:53 -0700
"L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

> On Thursday 2005-05-19 09:12 -0600, Bigelow, Jim (LaserJet Firmware) wrote:
> > > e-4) visibility
> > > Inheritance of visibility is:
> > >   CSS2: no
> > >   CSS2.1: yes
> > >   CSS3: no
> > > Although its not the conflict in CSS Print, but what spec must we 
> > > follow? As CSS2.1 says, inherited:yes???
> 
> Which css3 draft has it wrong?
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#the-visibility says it
> is inherited, but I wouldn't be surprised if the property ended up in
> more than one module.
> 
> -David
> 
> -- 
> L. David Baron                                <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
>           Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, The Mozilla Foundation
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 02:47:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:37 GMT