On Tue, 17 May 2005, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > S is currently defined as: > > s [ \t\r\n\f] > {s}+ {return S;} > > Should the definition of "s" also include '\v'? I'd rather we removed \f, personally... Why would it include \v, particularly? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2005 21:59:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:37 GMT