W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:57:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
Cc: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506141055320.8736@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> |
> | What Andrew meant was "would allow".  He's referring to
> | his own, currently rejected, proposal for a new type of unit.
> 
> What David meant was "not accepted" rather
> than "currently rejected" :-P.

Actually until a formal, clear, well-defined spec for what "%%" means is 
sent to this list, it's not even a proposal.

So far it has -- at best -- been described anecdotally.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 10:57:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:37 GMT