On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > | > | What Andrew meant was "would allow". He's referring to > | his own, currently rejected, proposal for a new type of unit. > > What David meant was "not accepted" rather > than "currently rejected" :-P. Actually until a formal, clear, well-defined spec for what "%%" means is sent to this list, it's not even a proposal. So far it has -- at best -- been described anecdotally. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 10:57:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:37 GMT