W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2005

Re: [CSS3] UI element states pseudo-classes

From: Paul Norman <penorman@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:05:20 -0500
Message-Id: <EF49DB68-6292-11D9-8A91-001124301DAA@mac.com>
To: www-style@w3.org

On 9-Jan-05, at 3:12 AM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:

> | It doesn't, actually.  Apart from the issue Laurens pointed out, 
> :checked
> | applies to <option> elements in HTML, say....
> Why not
> option[selected]?
> why selected state needs to be named as ":checked"?

What you suggest will only select an element if it is selected by 
I'll use the case of checkboxes since I find them easier to talk about.
If you have some checkbox that isn't checked by default and it hasn't 
been checked
neither selector matches it. If a user then checks it :checked will 
match it
but what you suggest using won't.
Received on Sunday, 9 January 2005 23:05:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:16 UTC