- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:14:01 +0100
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- CC: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>
Bert Bos wrote: >> Also there is a lot of red in the draft and no clear reason why the >> separate background and border module had to be merged. > > Because 'border-image' also creates a background, and because for > many designers, it seems, borders and backgrounds belong together: > what looks like a border, can actually be made up of images that are > backgrounds in CSS terms. I understand that. It would be nice if the draft said that in the "Abstract" chapter for example or in a new chapter "Introduction" which gives some examples of usage. >> The abstract also still refers to CSS 2.0 instead of CSS 2.1. Was >> that intended? > > Yes, while CSS 2.1 is not a Recommendation yet. That contradicts for a bit with chapter 2.1 about changes from CSS 2.1. >> The lack of subsections in the draft makes it quite hard to read. > > I'm open for suggestions. Grouping the properties in two chapters and creating subsections from that would make it more clear I guess. (One for 'border' and one for 'background', obviously.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Friday, 25 February 2005 18:14:25 UTC