W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2005

Re: [css3-background] some initial feedback

From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:18:55 +0100
To: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200502242018.55434.bert@w3.org>

On Wednesday 16 February 2005 20:29, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Why does "Previous version" not mention:
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-border-20021107/>?

Because nobody thought about it :-(

I'll add it in the next version.

>
> Also there is a lot of red in the draft and no clear reason why the
> separate background and border module had to be merged.

Because 'border-image' also creates a background, and because for many 
designers, it seems, borders and backgrounds belong together: what 
looks like a border, can actually be made up of images that are 
backgrounds in CSS terms.

>
> The abstract also still refers to CSS 2.0 instead of CSS 2.1. Was
> that intended?

Yes, while CSS 2.1 is not a Recommendation yet.

>
> The lack of subsections in the draft makes it quite hard to read.

I'm open for suggestions.



Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 19:19:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:36 GMT