W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Selectors, section 6.5: Editorial

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512291703430.17886@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> 
> In the sentence "W3C ID selectors represent an element instance based on 
> its identifier." the initial "W3C" feels superfluous. Why not just "ID 
> selectors? Why are these "W3C ID selectors"?

This (and another occurance of the term) was an editorial mistake. I have 
removed the "W3C" prefix which the working group already agreed to remove 
before publication.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 17:07:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:42 GMT