W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Selectors: editorial 6.3.4

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:03:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512291657000.17886@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> 
> The example in section 6.3.4 uses a "notation" attribute. To my mind 
> this makes me think of NOTATION type attributes, which is really not 
> what's meant here. I suggest using a different name for the notation 
> attribute simply to avoid any possible confusion. "base" or "radix" 
> might work well here.

I have changed "notation" to "radix". I will let you know if the working 
group disagrees with this change.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 17:04:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:42 GMT