- From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:53:01 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Hi, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >* Craig Northway wrote: > > >>Section 5.2 >> >>This section references CSS3. Why does the specification reference >>future versions like this? >> >> > >To put the draft into the context of work that already happend or >happens in parallel. For example, css3-colors and css3-selectors >are referenced in informative notes and these are not "future" >drafts but Candidate Recommendations while CSS 2.1 is just a Working >Draft at this point. These references are meant to aid the reader, > > > >>Please remove all references to CSS3 from CSS 2.1. >> >> > >and not normative, so I don't really see why we should make the >document less readable. Perhaps you can elaborate on your concerns? > > Similarly to Robin (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0251.html), I assume that higher version number documents are used to indicate later specifications. These references are therefore confusing to the reader. Regards, Craig
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 13:53:22 UTC