- From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:30:58 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org
Hi, Ian Hickson wrote: >On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Craig Northway wrote: > > >>>that might well be so but that's not the case at the moment. CSS is >>>more commonly used with HTML than with XHTML documents, it therefore >>>makes sense to include HTML examples in the CSS specifications. >>> >>> >>Aren't valid xhtml documents valid html documents? (in general). >> >> > >Oh, no, not by a long shot. It is in fact impossible to create a document >that is valid both HTML and XHTML, and very hard to get even close with >any non-trivial use of XHTML. > > Fair enough. A rather ill informed statement then. Perhaps some XHTML examples to complement the many HTML examples would be a good idea. Thanks, Craig
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 13:31:12 UTC