W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2005

RE: [OT] [CSS21] xml namespace (was Re: xml:id versus xmlid)

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:31:00 -0400
Message-ID: <F13E1BF26B19BA40AF3C0DE7D4DA0C03043D88B9@ati-mail01.arbortext.local>
To: "Elliotte Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, "Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, <www-style@w3.org>, "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <public-xml-id@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-id-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-id-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Elliotte Harold
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 April, 2005 12:22
> To: Robin Berjon
> Cc: Ian Hickson; Henry S. Thompson; www-style@w3.org; Norman 
> Walsh; public-xml-id@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [OT] [CSS21] xml namespace (was Re: xml:id versus xmlid)
> 
> 
> Robin Berjon wrote:
> 
> >  - the 'http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace' namespace IRI 
> cannot be
> >    mapped to any prefix other than 'xml'; and
> 
> That's a 1.1 rule. It does not appear to be a 1.0 rule.

That's not quite true.  See
http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-names-19990114-errata#NE05
for the Erratum to NS 1.0.

paul
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:31:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:36 GMT