W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2005

Re: [CSS3] xml namespace

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:07:09 +0100
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b7jipcyj6.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Ian Hickson writes:

> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> >
>> > What's the use case? [for binding 'xml' to the XML namespace 
>> > automatically] This seems like it would complicate the spec and the 
>> > implementations, as well as make full tutorials slightly more 
>> > complicated, without any real benefit to the end user. When would you 
>> > ever use this namespace in CSS?
>> 
>> I have no idea
>
> I am very reluctant for us to add features without good use cases, 
> especially when they make things more complicated.

I hear you, but you are operating in a constrained environment here
--- Insofar as you're adding namespace support to CSS3, you really
ought to do so in a way that respects the Namespace REC itself as
closely as possible.  It simply confuses users if you take
almost-all-but-not-quite of what that REC says, and it says that 'xml'
is pre-bound exclusively and irrevocably to
'http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace' and _vice versa_.

I don't see how it makes things more complicated for _users_, and it's
trivial for implementors.

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2005 16:07:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:36 GMT