I've considered the background module for a couple months now, and have found a handful of real-world use cases that currently exist that will be made more difficult or impossible through the multiple-background syntax as it stands. I believe I can propose a new syntax for multiple-backgrounds that works in these cases and (I believe) in the cases the current background proposal works in. What is the best way for me to bring these ideas to the list? I hardly want to spend a lot of my time composing something that wastes your time. Is a thorough post on the matter best? Or a static web-page with on-list discussion, a la the recently-cited http://blog.ben-ward.co.uk/archive/2004/12/21/css3_required_properties ? I understand that adhering to existing syntax/grammar when possible is best and maybe necessary, but does it help (or hurt!) to mimc the presentation of the spec? -- Ben Curtis : webwright bivia : a personal web studio http://www.bivia.com v: (818) 507-6613Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 21:20:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:36 GMT