W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2005

Re: [css3-background] comments

From: Emrah BASKAYA <emrahbaskaya@hesido.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:07:28 +0300
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <opso0peqap8nstxa@lomarnona>

> And I'd like to be able to anti-alias rounded borders to the extent I  
> choose. If I couldn't anti-alias them at all, I'd use an image.

"The extent of the anti-alias" could only be the sampling rate, and this  
is a totally an issue with the user-agent. The more sampling, the better  
(and when I say better, I mean always better this time!). There is no  
pixel-width of an anti-alias, when you talk about pixel widths, it sounds  
more like glow like Lauren Holst mentions. AA is affected by how many  
sub-pixels you take into account when rendering. And btw, I do not know  
how Amaya handles its AA fonts, but its fonts wouldnt look out of focus if  
it had enough sampling. So yes, it should indeed disable its AA if it  
can't do it properly!


-- 
Emrah BASKAYA
www.hesido.com
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2005 13:07:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:36 GMT