I'm assuming/hoping that there would also be some standard compatibility like in other CSS versions: background-top: url(image); background-bottom: url(image); Maybe that would only be necessary if there were going to be backgrounds in all four corners? What about positioning a background at top-right? Anyway, if there is only to be one top and one bottom, then I would think background: url(top), url(bottom); might be best... yet again, what if you *only* want background-bottom, and not top? My $0.02 worth. -Andrew HannaReceived on Sunday, 31 October 2004 08:17:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:34 GMT