- From: Anne van Kesteren (fora) <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 07:48:43 +0200
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Cc: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
>> And that is exactly why your proposal doesn't make sense ;-) > > Set of allowed values for 'font-size' attribute and e.g. for 'width' > attribute are already not equal. > > Following your logic 'auto' value should be considered as wrong > because it cannot be applied to font-size. No you are wrong. '<length>' is allowed both on 'font-size' and 'width' and there are no restrictions on things that are defined within '<length>' like it should. > Anne, sorry, but I cannot understand your logic here. Then reread everything inside the specification if you haven't done already. > Just consider 'auto' not as only value but as a units name. These > 'auto' units has not only 'auto' (100%%) value but also 80auto > (80%%), etc. 'auto' is a value, not a unit. A unit is part of a value. > Just imagine that instead of > > <length> Specifies a fixed width. .... auto See the section > ..... > > you will see > > <length> Specifies a fixed width. .... <auto> See the section > describing auto units..... > > Is this not clear? This is clear, but it doesn't make sense, since '%%' would be part of '<length>'. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Friday, 21 May 2004 01:49:00 UTC