*Kynn Bartlett*: > > So basically, Dave is saying, "I need some way to ensure that what > I write is either going to (a) work, or (b) not do anything at all, > because (c) partially work will screw up the presentation for the > user." Like already proposed, the minimal solution was a grouping at-rule, like @batch { foo {property1: value; property2: value} } If the browser can apply *all* rulesets inside, they are, else none of them. Can anyone provide an example which this approach cannot solve? > @supports(td:hover) {/* CSS code */} You would have to be able to nest such blocks or add support for at least AND constructs. > The core concept is that only the browser knows exactly what the > browser is capable of -- Exactly. Any such mechanism should only be designed to work around non implemented parts, not wrongly implemented ones (bugs).Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2004 17:53:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:27 GMT