W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2004

Re: [CSS21] Test Suite

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:21:39 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200407241921.i6OJLdj02319@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

> images more faithfully than JPEG.  Neither GIF nor PNG, though, is both
> smaller and better than JPEG for large screen shots of computer desktops,

The sort of screen shots I'm thinking of are of application windows.
There is a problem with the latest generation, that the only efficient
graphices format would WMF or SVG, but there are still a lot of NT 4/
Window 98 generation applications around and these tend to produce
much smaller GIFs than JPEGs, with the advantage that the text is sharp.

Anything with a significant wallpaper content will not compress well
with GIF or PNG, but will also need a very conservative JPEG compression,
to minimise distortion of the, often very small, text.  XP's own screens
tend to break even between compromise compression JPEG and GIF; the
tradeoff is between banding in colour gradients and distorted fine
detail and text.
Received on Saturday, 24 July 2004 15:21:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:14 UTC