> > h1:has(h1 > div) > > Yes. :-) Well, just recognized it's h1:has(h1 + div) :) > (That, or some variant on the syntax -- there have been several versions, > none completely perfect, so if this ever gets added to the spec it is > likely to vary a little from all the proposals so far.) I'm definitely looking forward to any implementation of this (and not only me, I guess), and I also cannot wait until there's at long last the possibility to write a complex and sophisticated site or document without *any* 'class' (and of course 'style') attribute, which is definitely the most elegant :) Best regards, Jens. -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect http://meiert.com/Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:52:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:25 GMT