- From: Werner Donné <werner.donne@re.be>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:12:41 +0100
- To: "BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)" <jim.bigelow@hp.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Jim, The specificity calculation is expressed in terms of selectors, which in turn are expressed in terms of elements. It could indeed also apply to at-page rules. But shouldn't the specification then say somewhere that an "anonymous" at-page rule corresponds to the universal element selector and a named at-page rule to a type selector? Regards, Werner. BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote: > Werner, > > Thank you for your comment, it has been assign the number 34. > > You wrote: > >>Shouldn't there also be a cascading relationship between >>"anonymous" at-page rules and named at-page rules, where the >>latter would be stronger then the former? > > > I think the concept of specificity [1] already supplies the relationship you > describe. > > Jim > > [1] Item 3 of http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#cascading-order > > -- Werner Donné -- Re BVBA Engelbeekstraat 8 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: werner.donne@re.be
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 05:12:48 UTC