On Monday, February 23, 2004, 12:58:18 AM, Ian wrote: IH> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Chris Lilley wrote: >> On Monday, February 23, 2004, 12:30:13 AM, Ian wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Bert Bos wrote: >>>> >>>> But Mozilla shows the source. Maybe because it doesn't know that >>>> application/rdf+xml is a form of XML... >>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155730 >> >> Getting off topic, but ... >> >> is that true for any +xml type? IH> Is what true for any +xml type? That Mozilla will not try to display it as XML IH> Mozilla currently only recognises certain XML types as being XML. It does IH> not support RFC3023's conventions. OK, that is what I was asking. I then asked why: >> If so, is that because >> >> a) a recogniser for +xml types that parses as XML and displays with >> CSS if linked, has not been implemented yet IH> Yes. That's the bug linked to above. Thanks. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture GroupReceived on Sunday, 22 February 2004 19:18:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:26 GMT