W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [CSS21] response to issue 115 (and 44)

From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:23:12 -0500
Message-ID: <410-220042318232312625@mindspring.com>
To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
Cc: "W3C CSS List" <www-style@w3.org>

> [Original Message]
> From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
> On Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 11:41:31 PM, Boris wrote:
> BZ> I suppose we could just specify such sheets as invalid and refuse to
> BZ> them
> BZ> Or specify that they are UTF-8 (a la XML).
> BZ> Both would break most pages out there.
> Because most stylesheets out there are in what? Most are in US-ASCII,
> I would guess, since the entire syntax of CSS uses US-ASCII. The only
> opportunities to have anything else are replaced content in:before and
> :after, which is not too common in practice since it doesn't work in
> MSIE/Win.
> So, if most stylesheets are US-ASCII then a default of UTF-8 would
> work pretty well.

Better hope that the author hasn't used any classes or IDs that don't use
non-ASCII characters as well. For non-English documents, I'd say that's
an unreasonable assumption, since its likely the author will be using
names that are meaningful to him in his native language.

Most US stylesheets /= Most stylesheets.

Think globally. Act locally!
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 18:23:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:11 UTC